<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PonderAbout.com</title>
	<link>http://www.ponderabout.com</link>
	<description>You know, I was thinking about...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 11:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Awfulizing</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1530/awfulizing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1530/awfulizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 11:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1530/awfulizing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[psychologist Albert Ellis coined the term awfulizing
to refer to a distortion of thinking 
when we awfulize, an event or situation is thought
of in overly negative terms 
it&#8217;s a kind of negative exaggeration where, for exam-
ple, a minor setback is seen as a major catastrophe
awfulizing can set into motion a chain of self-fulfilling
thoughts, feelings and actions;
the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>psychologist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Ellis">Albert Ellis</a> coined the term <strong>awfulizing</strong><br />
to refer to a distortion of thinking </p>
<p>when we <em>awfulize</em>, an event or situation is thought<br />
of in overly negative terms </p>
<p>it&#8217;s a kind of negative exaggeration where, for exam-<br />
ple, a minor setback is seen as a major catastrophe</p>
<p>awfulizing can set into motion a chain of self-fulfilling<br />
thoughts, feelings and actions;</p>
<p>the mere expectation that things will get worse<br />
will cause them to get worse</p>
<p>take a look below at the fabled, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henny_Penny">Henny Penny</a> </p>
<p>one day while peacefully eating lunch in the shade<br />
of a large oak, Henny Penny was struck on the head<br />
by a falling acorn;</p>
<p>her conclusion -</p>
<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/hennypennyaaa.png" alt="a" /><br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/hennypennybbb.png" alt="b" /></p>
<p>Henny is <em>awfulizing</em>, misinterpreting a situation in<br />
terms so negative that her view bears little resem-<br />
blance to reality</p>
<p>she needs a friend, a <em>Goosey Loosey</em> or a <em>Turkey<br />
Lurkey</em>, to tell her to chill out, look around (and up)<br />
and consider another view of her situation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1530/awfulizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jumping into a 7,964 mile deep hole</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1534/jumping-into-a-7964-mile-deep-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1534/jumping-into-a-7964-mile-deep-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Science &amp; Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1534/jumping-into-a-7964-mile-deep-hole/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what if you jumped into a 7,964 mile deep hole;
a hole that came out on the other side globe?
and if you were ever to stop, how fast and how far
would you have traveled?
and how much time would your journey have taken?
for the answers to these questions, check out the
video below, an excerpt from the History [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if you jumped into a 7,964 mile deep hole;<br />
a hole that came out on the other side globe?</p>
<p>and if you were ever to stop, how fast and how far<br />
would you have traveled?</p>
<p>and how much time would your journey have taken?</p>
<p>for the answers to these questions, check out the<br />
video below, an excerpt from the History Channel&#8217;s<br />
<a href="http://www.history.com/shows.do?episodeId=281313&#038;action=detail">The Universe, Gravity</a></p>
<object width="332" height="248">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FAFUSbIs5KA"> </param>
<p> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FAFUSbIs5KA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="248"> </embed> </object>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1534/jumping-into-a-7964-mile-deep-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>what does meditation FEEL like?</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1532/what-does-meditating-feel-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1532/what-does-meditating-feel-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Spiritual]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Poems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1532/what-does-meditating-feel-like/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
in a previous post, meditation was defined as,
“the intentional and sustained focusing of attention”
like any definition, this one is limited and incomplete;
it may convey something about the mechanics of
meditation, but nothing about other aspects of the
phenomenon -
aspects such as the feelings, thoughts and images
experienced during meditation 
defining an experiential state, however, is not easy;
it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/med.png" alt="med" /></p>
<p>in a previous post, <strong><em>meditation</em></strong> was defined as,<br />
“the intentional and sustained focusing of attention”</p>
<p>like any definition, this one is limited and incomplete;<br />
it may convey something about the <em>mechanics</em> of<br />
meditation, but nothing about other aspects of the<br />
phenomenon -</p>
<p>aspects such as the feelings, thoughts and images<br />
experienced during meditation </p>
<p>defining an experiential state, however, is not easy;<br />
it is a task perhaps best left to poets like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Whitman">Walt<br />
Whitman</a></p>
<p>the soundtrack of the video below is an excerpt<br />
from Whitman&#8217;s <em>To the Sun-Set Breeze</em></p>
<p>the poet&#8217;s words provide a good description of a<br />
state often associated with meditation</p>
<object width="332" height="248">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j4s7ogE3x-4"> </param>
<p> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j4s7ogE3x-4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="248"> </embed> </object>
<p>the above is an excerpt from  PBS&#8217;s <em>Walt Whitman</em>,<br />
which can be seen in full <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/whitman/">here</a></p>
<p><strong>To the Sun-Set Breeze</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Ah, whispering, something again, unseen,</p>
<p>Where late this heated day thou enterest<br />
at my window</p>
<p>Thou, laving, tempering all, cool-freshing,<br />
gently vitalizing</p>
<p>Me, old, alone, sick, weak-down, melted -<br />
worn with sweat;</p>
<p>Thou, nestling, folding close and firm yet soft,<br />
companion better than talk, book, art,</p>
<p>So sweet thy primitive taste to breathe within&#8211;<br />
thy soothing fingers on my face and hands,</p>
<p>Thou, messenger&#8211;magical strange bringer<br />
to body and spirit of me,</p>
<p>(Distances balk&#8217;d&#8211;occult medicines<br />
penetrating me from head to foot,)</p>
<p>I feel the sky, the prairies vast -</p>
<p>I feel the mighty northern lakes,</p>
<p>I feel the ocean and the forest -</p>
<p>somehow I feel the globe itself<br />
    swift-swimming in space . . .</strong><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1532/what-does-meditating-feel-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will you act and speak in 2108?</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1526/how-will-you-act-and-speak-in-2108/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1526/how-will-you-act-and-speak-in-2108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal Questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1526/how-will-you-act-and-speak-in-2108/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
they say &#8220;you can&#8217;t teach an old dog new tricks&#8221; -
but if we could, should we?
an old dog, or old-timer, looks silly when he wears
the latest fashions or uses the latest slang -
so damned silly that you&#8217;d think he&#8217;d become aware
of how ludicrous he appears and knock it off  
if Abe Lincoln were still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/lincoln1.png" alt="1" /></p>
<p>they say &#8220;you can&#8217;t teach an old dog new tricks&#8221; -</p>
<p>but if we could, <strong><em>should</em></strong> we?</p>
<p>an old dog, or old-timer, looks silly when he wears<br />
the latest fashions or uses the latest slang -</p>
<p>so damned silly that you&#8217;d think he&#8217;d become aware<br />
of how ludicrous he appears and knock it off  </p>
<p>if Abe Lincoln were still around today, he would <strong><em>not</em></strong><br />
be greeting his fellow citizens with a &#8220;Hey dude!&#8221; -</p>
<p>no, Mr. Lincoln would be way too smart for that</p>
<p>but how about you and me?</p>
<p>what are <strong><em>we</em></strong> going to do in the year <strong><em>2108</em></strong>, when<br />
we&#8217;re still around and kicking; thanks to the coming<br />
scientific breakthroughs that will extend our lives<br />
indefinitely?</p>
<p>breakthroughs that people like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil">Ray Kurzweil</a> are<br />
writing about in non-fiction best sellers like,</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantastic_Voyage:_Live_Long_Enough_to_Live_Forever">Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever </a></p>
<p>will we still dress, speak and gesture as we do today,<br />
or will we be making <em>spectacles</em> of ourselves??</p>
<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/lincoln2.png" alt="2" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1526/how-will-you-act-and-speak-in-2108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blindly Repeating Patterns</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1529/blindly-repeating-patterns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1529/blindly-repeating-patterns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spiritual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1529/blindly-repeating-patterns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[consciousness  researcher John Lilly  believed that we
are stuck in &#8220;blindly repeating patterns&#8221; of thinking,
feeling and acting;
and that we habitually and unconsciously repeat
these patterns again and again and again -
going &#8217;round and &#8217;round - but going nowhere
Lilly believed that our repetitive thinking, feeling and
acting protects us from novelty, risk and anxiety; and
that it gives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>consciousness  researcher <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Lilly">John Lilly </a> believed that we<br />
are stuck in &#8220;blindly repeating patterns&#8221; of thinking,<br />
feeling and acting;</p>
<p>and that we habitually and unconsciously repeat<br />
these patterns again and again and again -</p>
<p>going &#8217;round and &#8217;round - but going nowhere</p>
<p>Lilly believed that our repetitive thinking, feeling and<br />
acting protects us from novelty, risk and anxiety; and<br />
that it gives us the illusion of safety and security</p>
<p>it also limits our experiences, stunts our growth<br />
and keeps us from achieving our almost unlimited<br />
potential</p>
<p>Dr. Lilly expressed these thoughts in the sound-<br />
track of the video below, an excerpt from a work-<br />
shop called <a href="http://www.johnclilly.com/">Through the Center of the Mandala</a></p>
<object width="332" height="248">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TQsxwSi5FJg"> </param>
<p> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TQsxwSi5FJg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="248"> </embed> </object>
<p>in the above video, Lilly&#8217;s words are set against<br />
excerpts of Fritz Lang&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis_%28film%29">Metropolis</a> (1927)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1529/blindly-repeating-patterns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Lennon&#8217;s Dylan Parody</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1527/john-lennons-dylan-parody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1527/john-lennons-dylan-parody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1527/john-lennons-dylan-parody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you Google &#8220;Dylan&#8221; and &#8220;Lennon&#8221;, you&#8217;ll find a lot
of dubious speculation regarding Dylan&#8217;s influence
on John&#8217;s lyrics and Lennon&#8217;s thoughts about Dylan
there is no doubt, however, that Lennon was keenly
aware of Dylan&#8217;s style; and could imitate it exceed-
ingly well -
as he does in the song parody below

 
   
the soundtrack of the above [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you Google &#8220;Dylan&#8221; and &#8220;Lennon&#8221;, you&#8217;ll find a lot<br />
of dubious speculation regarding Dylan&#8217;s influence<br />
on John&#8217;s lyrics and Lennon&#8217;s thoughts about Dylan</p>
<p>there is no doubt, however, that Lennon was keenly<br />
aware of Dylan&#8217;s style; and could imitate it exceed-<br />
ingly well -</p>
<p>as he does in the song parody below</p>
<object width="332" height="248">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-bvVdAmYfXI"> </param>
<p> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-bvVdAmYfXI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="248"> </embed> </object>
<p>the soundtrack of the above video is an excerpt from<br />
Westwood One&#8217;s <a href="http://littleabby.podomatic.com/">The Lost Lennon Tapes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1527/john-lennons-dylan-parody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rings of Saturn</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1524/the-rings-of-saturn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1524/the-rings-of-saturn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Science &amp; Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1524/the-rings-of-saturn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NASA image

Galileo Galilei was the first to observe the rings of
Saturn  when, in 1610, he turned his 20-power tele-
scope toward the planet the Romans had named
Saturnus, after the god of agriculture
Galileo assumed that the rings were &#8220;handles&#8221; or
large moons positioned on either side of the planet
He wrote, 
&#8220;I have observed the highest planet [Saturn] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/strngs.jpg" alt="e" /><br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Voyager_ring_spokes.jpg/581px-Voyager_ring_spokes.jpg">NASA image<br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo">Galileo Galilei</a> was the first to observe the rings of<br />
Saturn  when, in 1610, he turned his 20-power tele-<br />
scope toward the planet the Romans had named<br />
<strong><em>Saturnus</em></strong>, after the god of agriculture</p>
<p>Galileo assumed that the rings were &#8220;handles&#8221; or<br />
large moons positioned on either side of the planet</p>
<p>He wrote, </p>
<p><strong>&#8220;<em>I have observed the highest planet [Saturn] to be tripled-bodied. This is to say that to my very great amazement Saturn was seen to me to be not a single star, but three together, which almost touch each other&#8221;.</em></strong><br />
- <a href="http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/saturn/back.html">NASA</a></p>
<p>today, we know that the rings are not any of the<br />
more than 60 moons that orbit the planet -</p>
<p>but what are they?</p>
<p>from the data gathered by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_11">Pioneer 11</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1">Voyager 1</a>,<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_2">Voyager 2</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassini_spacecraft">Cassini–Huygens</a> we now understand<br />
the following -</p>
<p>- the rings are 173,000 miles in diameter, with a<br />
thickness of less than 70 feet</p>
<p>- they consist of billions of pulverized particles that<br />
range in size from specks smaller than a grain of<br />
sand to boulders larger than a house</p>
<p>- the particles are comprised mainly of water ice</p>
<p>- they race around the planet, colliding into one<br />
another in a cosmic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roller_derby">roller derby</a></p>
<p>- and they move at speeds that range from 20,000 to<br />
40,000 mph; that&#8217;s somewhere between 25 and 50<br />
times faster than the speed of sound</p>
<p>for more on the rings, from the men and women<br />
who study them, check out the video below</p>
<object width="332" height="248">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AepyHokNmhA"> </param>
<p> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AepyHokNmhA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="248"> </embed> </object>
<p>the above video is a brief excerpt of the <em>History<br />
Channel</em>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.history.com/minisite.do?content_type=Minisite_Episodes&#038;content_type_id=54042&#038;display_order=7&#038;mini_id=54036">The Universe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1524/the-rings-of-saturn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsolicited Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1519/unsolicited-advice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1519/unsolicited-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Interpersonal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1519/unsolicited-advice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
.

unsolicited advice is often unwelcome and resisted
it can imply that the advice-giver believes that he
has the superior knowledge; and in this way it can
be offensive to the listener
communications experts say that a listener is more
likely to be receptive to advice if he requests it
the experts also note that if we want to be of help
to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/paadvice1.png" alt="a1" /></p>
<p>.<br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/paadvice2.png" alt="a2" /></p>
<p>unsolicited advice is often unwelcome and resisted</p>
<p>it can imply that the advice-giver believes that he<br />
has the superior knowledge; and in this way it can<br />
be offensive to the listener</p>
<p>communications experts say that a listener is more<br />
likely to be receptive to advice if he requests it</p>
<p>the experts also note that if we want to be of help<br />
to someone who is struggling with a problem, there<br />
is an effective alternative to unsolicited advice -</p>
<p>we can ask good questions - questions that help<br />
the listener define the problem and identify the<br />
resources needed to solve it</p>
<p>questions like,</p>
<p><strong><em>What bothers you most about this situation?<br />
What questions do you have?<br />
What needs to be done?<br />
What are your resources and limitations?<br />
How much can you do?<br />
How can someone be helpful</em></strong>?</p>
<p>of course, the fewer questions asked, the better -<br />
a barrage of questions can be just as much of a<br />
turn-off as advice that is unsolicited</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1519/unsolicited-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Planet That Would Float</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1522/the-planet-that-would-float/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1522/the-planet-that-would-float/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Science &amp; Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1522/the-planet-that-would-float/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NASA image
the density of Saturn is lower than that of any planet
in our solar system
in fact, its density (0.687 g/cm³) is lower than that of
water (0.998 g/cm³)
which means that if Saturn were to be plopped in
some some vast mega-ocean

MIROSLAV VAJDIC 
it would float

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pasatrn1.gif" alt="a" /><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_%282004-10-06%29.jpg">NASA image</a></p>
<p>the density of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn">Saturn</a> is lower than that of any planet<br />
in our solar system</p>
<p>in fact, its density (0.687 g/cm³) is lower than that of<br />
water (0.998 g/cm³)</p>
<p>which means that if Saturn were to be plopped in<br />
some some vast mega-ocean</p>
<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pasatrn2.jpg" alt="b" /><br />
<a href="http://openphoto.net/volumes/miro/20060915/openphotonet_P9067771.JPG">MIROSLAV VAJDIC</a> </p>
<p>it would float</p>
<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pasatrn3.jpg" alt="c" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1522/the-planet-that-would-float/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Always The Same Age Inside</title>
		<link>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1521/always-the-same-age-inside/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1521/always-the-same-age-inside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Great Questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1521/always-the-same-age-inside/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
.

.

.

.

.

why is it, indeed!?
what is that part of us, seemingly somewhere deep
within, that seems to never change, never age??
is it the Soul?, the Ego?, the Self? or nothing more
than an illusion arising from brain physiology and
functioning?
this question is worth pondering, and the answer
we arrive at says a lot about who we are
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/paf.png" alt="f" /></p>
<p>.<br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pac2.png" alt="e" /></p>
<p>.<br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pad.png" alt="d" /></p>
<p>.<br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pac2.png" alt="ss" /></p>
<p>.<br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/pae.png" alt="e" /></p>
<p>.<br />
<img src="http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z135/leonardogerard/paf.png" alt="f" /></p>
<p>why is it, indeed!?</p>
<p>what is that part of us, seemingly somewhere deep<br />
within, that seems to never change, never age??</p>
<p>is it the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul">Soul</a>?, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego">Ego</a>?, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_%28philosophy%29">Self</a>? or nothing more<br />
than an illusion arising from brain physiology and<br />
functioning?</p>
<p>this question is worth pondering, and the answer<br />
we arrive at says a lot about who we are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ponderabout.com/archives/1521/always-the-same-age-inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
